Bedichek MS Repurposing
As part of the Surplus Property Repurposing Process established by Â鶹¹û¶³´«Ã½ ISD, staff have completed Step 1 (Data Collection) and Step 2 (Scoring and Evaluation) for the Bedichek Middle School excess land.
Four potential reuse options were evaluated (tap/hover over each to learn what information is included in each category):
- Adaptive Reuse without Improvements
- Adaptive Reuse with Improvements
- Long-term Ground Lease
- Fee Simple Sale
Using the district’s 100-point scoring framework, Long-Term Ground Lease ranked highest, demonstrating the strongest overall alignment with district priorities, financial sustainability, and long-term flexibility.
Step 1: Data Collection and Key Findings
The district gathered and reviewed information to better understand this property and evaluate possible future uses. The materials below were used to assess each option and inform the scoring.
Click on each category to view the full report:
- Facility Condition and Maintenance Needs Assessment
- Historical Evaluation
Step 2: Scoring and Evaluation
Each reuse option was evaluated across the following categories (hover over each to learn what information is included in each category):
Scoring Matrix
| Scoring Category |
25-21 Very Well Aligned Minimal Tradeoffs |
20-16 Well Aligned Minor Tradeoffs |
15-11 Moderate Alignment Some Tradeoffs |
10-6 Low Alignment Notable Tradeoffs |
5-0 Poor Alignment High Risk or Cost |
Score Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market & Site Logistics | Highly desirable property with excellent development or reuse potential with no significant constraints. |
Attractive site with solid demand and few barriers. |
Average marketability and usable site conditions. |
Some potential but major constraints. |
Poor location, hard-to-develop or reuse site, zoning or environmental barriers, little market demand. |
A site may receive a low score for adaptive reuse if building A site may receive a low score for ground lease or sale if |
| Community Impact | Broad community support and strong public-serving impact with strong partner interest. |
Strong alignment with community needs but fewer potential partners. |
Some community benefits but also tradeoffs and moderate partner interest. |
Mixed community value, limited public benefit and partner interest. |
Significant community opposition or displacement concerns. Minimal or no partner interest. |
A site may receive a low score for adaptive reuse if such A site may receive a low score for ground lease or sale if |
| Financial Impact & Risk | Major long-term financial benefit and low implementation risk. |
Good revenue potential with manageable implementation risk. |
Financially neutral or manageable. Does not generate meaningful revenue but does not strain resources. |
Financially difficult or uncertain and strains District resources or forfeits benefit of asset appreciation. |
Large ongoing costs with little revenue potential and high implementation risk. |
A site may receive a low score for adaptive reuse A site may receive a low score for ground lease or |
| Flexibility & Optionality | Maximum future flexibility and reversibility. Few or low challenges to execute. |
Preserves future options for the District with some time restrictions. Manageable challenges to execute proposal. |
Some ability to adapt later with moderate time restrictions. Moderate challenges to execute proposal. |
Limited future adaptability or many challenges to execute proposal. |
Locks the District into a hard-to-reverse or difficult to execute proposal. |
A site may receive a low score for adaptive reuse A site may receive a low score for ground lease or |
| School Name | Adaptive Reuse Without Improvements | Adaptive Reuse With Improvements | Long-Term Ground Lease | Fee Simple Sale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bedichek (land) | 0 | 0 | 90 | 85 |
Step 2 Results
- Market Analysis: The site is located in an established area with moderate redevelopment potential. Market conditions support a land lease approach, allowing the district to retain ownership while enabling long-term value generation.
- Entitlement Study: Redevelopment is feasible under current conditions. Entitlement updates and coordination with a development partner will be required depending on the proposed use.
- Facility Condition and Maintenance Needs Assessment: Not applicable as the building is not included in the land repurposing.
- Public and Community Partner Engagement: Community input has highlighted interest in preserving neighborhood character as well as open spaces like the track and ensuring future uses provide community benefit, which can be addressed through lease structuring. Leasing provides more opportunities to collaborate with the development partner to address community benefit interests.
- Historical Evaluation: Formal historical designations do not apply to the excess land.
The highest scoring option for Bedichek Middle School (Land Only) is Long Term Ground Lease with a score of 90 out of 100.
Click here for more detailed scoring assessments
Next Steps
- Step 3: Financial Review and Staff Recommendation – Conduct a financial review incorporating district budget considerations, capital needs, and revenue requirements. Develop a staff recommendation based on scoring results and financial context. While scoring identifies options that are most aligned across evaluation criteria, the financial review may result in a different recommended option based on districtwide budget considerations and revenue needs.
Community members are encouraged to share feedback on the evaluation and scoring through the . The survey will remain open until June 9, 2026. - Step 4: Board Consideration – Present the final recommendation to the Board of Trustees for consideration and action.
Recommendation Pending
A preliminary staff recommendation for this site is still being developed and will be posted as soon as it is available.